Issues of Dance Training in Nigeria: A Comparative Study of The Performing Arts Department, Unilorin, and Crown Troupe of Africa

Main Article Content

Olúsànyà David Aye̩ni

Abstract

Dance training in Nigeria reflects diverse philosophies shaped by institutional frameworks and cultural practices. This comparative study examines the Performing Arts Department of the University of Ilorin (Unilorin) and the Crown Troupe of Africa, two prominent centers of dance education and performance. While Unilorin adopts a structured academic model encapsulated in the code of TPR—Theory, Practice, and Research, Crown Troupe of Africa emphasizes a community-driven approach defined by TTT—Talent, Time, and Target. Through qualitative analysis of training methods, curricula, and performance outcomes, the study highlights the strengths and challenges inherent in both systems. The TPR model fosters intellectual rigor, technical mastery, and scholarly inquiry, positioning dance as both an art and an academic discipline. Conversely, the TTT framework prioritizes creativity, experiential learning, and goal-oriented practice, nurturing performers who are deeply connected to cultural identity and social engagement. Findings reveal that while TPR ensures professionalization and sustainability within formal education, TTT cultivates adaptability, innovation, and grassroots relevance. The paper argues that integrating elements of both codes could enrich dance pedagogy in Nigeria, bridging the gap between academic scholarship and community artistry. Ultimately, this comparative study underscores the need for hybrid models that balance theory with creativity, research with cultural expression, and institutional training with community practice, thereby advancing the future of dance education and performance in Nigeria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Issues of Dance Training in Nigeria: A Comparative Study of The Performing Arts Department, Unilorin, and Crown Troupe of Africa. (2026). Integral Research, 3(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.57067/