The Body’s Discourse: Menstrual Narratives of Bengal under Intersection-Feminist Lens

Main Article Content

Suparna Ray

Abstract

Social presentations of ‘selective’ bodies undergo scrutinization of the untouched dichotomical power-play- “pure/impure”; here, this ‘norm’ of impurity on certain anatomical functions of particular selective bodies is an area of discussion, and from an intersectional dimension. Women as a notion and definition has been ascertaining too many features which have also been fixed by the social norms; Judith Butler eventually takes this thread of describing what a “women” is-- “Women are the sex which is not “one”. Within…a phallogocentric language, women constitute the unrepresentable…women represent the sex that cannot be thought, a linguistic absence and opacity” (Butler, 1990, 13). Hence, an empirical and observational qualitative research methodology will be followed with queer-post-structuralist-feminist-theory to decipher the ongoing menstrual marginalization merging with gender power dynamics, operating within Bengali culture, based on some interviews.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Body’s Discourse: Menstrual Narratives of Bengal under Intersection-Feminist Lens. (2025). Integral Research, 2(12), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.57067/